Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>, Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-26T18:32:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Second, there is the idea of doing #1, and having a GUC variable for #3.
> > Does anyone want that?  I think Marc may.  Anyone else?
> 
> Actually, in light of Tom's comment about it not being the same syntax, I
> have to admit that I missed that syntax difference in the original post :(
> I withdraw my GUC variable desire, unless/until someone does go with an
> 'ALTER SESSION' command ...

It is good we had the 'compatibility' discussion.  It is an important
point to always consider.

TODO updated:

	o Abort all SET changes made in an aborted transaction  
          
-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026