Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>, Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-26T18:32:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Second, there is the idea of doing #1, and having a GUC variable for #3.
> > Does anyone want that? I think Marc may. Anyone else?
>
> Actually, in light of Tom's comment about it not being the same syntax, I
> have to admit that I missed that syntax difference in the original post :(
> I withdraw my GUC variable desire, unless/until someone does go with an
> 'ALTER SESSION' command ...
It is good we had the 'compatibility' discussion. It is an important
point to always consider.
TODO updated:
o Abort all SET changes made in an aborted transaction
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026