Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-25T15:50:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 
> Just curious here, but has anyone taken the time to see how others are
> doing this?  For instance, if we go with 1, are going against how everyone
> else handles it?  IMHO, its not a popularity contest ...

Yes, good point.  I don't know that they use SET, but if they do, we
should find out how they handle it, though I doubt they have thought
through their SET handling as well as we have.  My guess is that they do
3, honor all SETs.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026