Vote on SET in aborted transaction
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2002-04-23T16:27:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
OK, would people please vote on how to handle SET in an aborted transaction? This vote will allow us to resolve the issue and move forward if needed. In the case of: SET x=1; BEGIN; SET x=2; query_that_aborts_transaction; SET x=3; COMMIT; at the end, should 'x' equal: 1 - All SETs are rolled back in aborted transaction 2 - SETs are ignored after transaction abort 3 - All SETs are honored in aborted transaction ? - Have SETs vary in behavior depending on variable Our current behavior is 2. Please vote and I will tally the results. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026