Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2002-04-17T22:04:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
mlw wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > 
> > OK, yes, sequential scan _can_ be as slow as index scan, but sometimes
> > it is faster.  Can you provide reasoning why index scan should be
> > preferred, other than the admin created it, which I already addressed?
> 
> If you have a choice between two or more sub-plans, similar in cost, say within
> 20% of one another. Choosing a plan which uses an index has a chance of
> improved performance if the estimates are wrong where as choosing the
> sequential scan will always have the full cost.

And the chance of reduced performance if the estimate was too low.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026