Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2002-04-17T22:04:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
mlw wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > OK, yes, sequential scan _can_ be as slow as index scan, but sometimes > > it is faster. Can you provide reasoning why index scan should be > > preferred, other than the admin created it, which I already addressed? > > If you have a choice between two or more sub-plans, similar in cost, say within > 20% of one another. Choosing a plan which uses an index has a chance of > improved performance if the estimates are wrong where as choosing the > sequential scan will always have the full cost. And the chance of reduced performance if the estimate was too low. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026