Re: 7.3 schedule
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
From: Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
To: "Ashley Cambrell" <ash@freaky-namuh.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-04-11T15:54:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:25:24 +1000 "Ashley Cambrell" <ash@freaky-namuh.com> wrote: > What are the chances that the BE/FE will be altered to take advantage of > prepare / execute? Or is it something that will "never happen"? Is there a need for this? The current patch I'm working on just does everything using SQL statements, which I don't think is too bad (the typical client programmer won't actually need to see them, their interface should wrap the PREPARE/EXECUTE stuff for them). On the other hand, there are already a few reasons to make some changes to the FE/BE protocol (NOTIFY messages, transaction state, and now possibly PREPARE/EXECUTE -- anything else?). IMHO, each of these isn't worth changing the protocol by itself, but perhaps if we can get all 3 in one swell foop it might be a good idea... Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC