Re: timeout implementation issues

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Oops does the first mean rolling back the variables on abort ?
> > > If so I made a mistake. The current is better than the second.
> > 
> > The second means all SET's are rolled back on abort.
> 
> I see.
> BTW what varibles are rolled back on abort currently ?

Currently, none, though the SET commands after the query aborts are
ignored, which is effectively the same as rolling them back.

	BEGIN WORK;
	SET x=3;
	failed query;
	SET x=5;
	COMMIT;

In this case, x=3 at end of query.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026