Re: Thoughts on the location of configuration files

Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>

From: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-12-19T06:13:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 01:09 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> >> Seems to me that someone who thinks the executables should be root-owned
> >> is likely to think the same of the config files.

> > Sorry to disappoint you :-).
 ...
> > However, IMHO, for best security, the executables do need to be root
> > owned.

> his exploit by overwriting the executables with malicious code.  If the
> config files can be overwritten by the postgres user, then you still
> have an avenue for an attacker to expand his privileges.  Example: he
> can trivially become postgres superuser after altering pg_hba.conf.

This much is true.  Hmmm. More thought required.
-- 
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11