Re: Thoughts on the location of configuration files
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
From: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-12-19T06:13:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 01:09 am, Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > >> Seems to me that someone who thinks the executables should be root-owned > >> is likely to think the same of the config files. > > Sorry to disappoint you :-). ... > > However, IMHO, for best security, the executables do need to be root > > owned. > his exploit by overwriting the executables with malicious code. If the > config files can be overwritten by the postgres user, then you still > have an avenue for an attacker to expand his privileges. Example: he > can trivially become postgres superuser after altering pg_hba.conf. This much is true. Hmmm. More thought required. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11