Thread

  1. Re: Pl/Tcl problem

    Ian Harding <ianh@tpchd.org> — 2001-12-17T16:51:29Z

    Oooooh.  Harsh.  I use tcl exclusively.  I have not had any problem and am keeping up with the latest versions of PostgreSQL.
    
    <comedy_not_invitation_to_flame>
    
    Maybe hardly anyone who uses tcl runs RedHat?  ;^)
    
    <\comedy_not_invitation_to_flame>
    
    
    Ian A. Harding
    Programmer/Analyst II
    Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department
    (253) 798-3549
    mailto: iharding@tpchd.org
    
    >>> Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> 12/15/01 09:17AM >>>
    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
    
    > But I'm not sure that this has anything to do with Alvaro's problem.
    > The bogus choice of soname has doubtless been that way for awhile,
    > and yet we've not had other complaints.
    
    Biggest reason: Hardly anyone uses tcl.
    
    We've shipped it that way, and there was one complaint month after we
    shipped... Comparing that to feedback on other areas in the same
    package, I just don't think the tcl functionality is used much. Tcl is
    exactly all the rage anymore.
    
    -- 
    Trond Eivind Glomsrød
    Red Hat, Inc.
    
    ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
    TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
    
    
    
  2. Re: Pl/Tcl problem

    Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> — 2001-12-17T17:19:40Z

    > Oooooh.  Harsh.  I use tcl exclusively.  I have not had any problem and am keeping up with the latest versions of PostgreSQL.
    > 
    > <comedy_not_invitation_to_flame>
    > 
    > Maybe hardly anyone who uses tcl runs RedHat?  ;^)
    > 
    > <\comedy_not_invitation_to_flame>
    
    If not Tcl/Tk, I was wondering what other scripting language people use
    to write X apps?  Python?  Perl/Tk?  Hard to argue these are
    particularly better than Tcl/Tk, especially for small apps.
    
    -- 
      Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
      pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
      +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
      +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
    
    
  3. Re: Pl/Tcl problem

    Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> — 2001-12-17T17:24:51Z

    Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
    
    > > Oooooh.  Harsh.  I use tcl exclusively.  I have not had any problem and am keeping up with the latest versions of PostgreSQL.
    > > 
    > > <comedy_not_invitation_to_flame>
    > > 
    > > Maybe hardly anyone who uses tcl runs RedHat?  ;^)
    > > 
    > > <\comedy_not_invitation_to_flame>
    > 
    > If not Tcl/Tk, I was wondering what other scripting language people use
    > to write X apps?  Python?  Perl/Tk?  Hard to argue these are
    > particularly better than Tcl/Tk, especially for small apps.
    
    X? Python + glade is used a lot, Perl-GTK is also popular. Or you
    write it in C or C++ (kde). Perhaps even java. I haven't seen much
    use of tcl/tk for this in years. 
    
    (FWIW, we had a few tcl/tk in Red Hat Linux a couple of years
    ago. All the ones we made are gone, and the ones in most apps as well) 
    -- 
    Trond Eivind Glomsrød
    Red Hat, Inc.
    
    
  4. Re: Pl/Tcl problem

    Darren Ferguson <darren@crystalballinc.com> — 2001-12-17T18:10:35Z

    It is everyone's choice and API.
    
    I use the pltcl because i use tcl when using aolserver. It is very good
    and i know a lot of other people who use the tcl api also.
    
    However i am not taking anything away from perl,python and the other
    languages because they are all good in their own way
    
    My 2 cents
    
    Darren
    
    
    Darren Ferguson
    Software Engineer
    Openband
    
    On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
    
    > > Oooooh.  Harsh.  I use tcl exclusively.  I have not had any problem and am keeping up with the latest versions of PostgreSQL.
    > > 
    > > <comedy_not_invitation_to_flame>
    > > 
    > > Maybe hardly anyone who uses tcl runs RedHat?  ;^)
    > > 
    > > <\comedy_not_invitation_to_flame>
    > 
    > If not Tcl/Tk, I was wondering what other scripting language people use
    > to write X apps?  Python?  Perl/Tk?  Hard to argue these are
    > particularly better than Tcl/Tk, especially for small apps.
    > 
    > -- 
    >   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
    >   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
    >   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
    >   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
    > 
    > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
    > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    >     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
    > 
    
    
    
  5. Re: Pl/Tcl problem

    Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> — 2001-12-17T19:00:27Z

    On Monday 17 December 2001 12:24 pm, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
    > (FWIW, we had a few tcl/tk in Red Hat Linux a couple of years
    > ago. All the ones we made are gone, and the ones in most apps as well)
    
    The tcl/tk configuration apps.... Ugh.
    
    Well, in any case, there is a problem with the pl/tcl build.  The 
    /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh on RH 7.2 defines:
    # Base command to use for combining object files into a shared library:
    TCL_SHLIB_LD='gcc -pipe -shared -Wl,-soname,libtcl.so.0'
    
    So this is where it comes from.  Now, why does it work with a non-RPM 
    installation?
    
    A patch is in order --but to what?  Hmmm.....
    -- 
    Lamar Owen
    WGCR Internet Radio
    1 Peter 4:11
    
    
  6. Re: Pl/Tcl problem

    Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com> — 2001-12-17T19:06:26Z

    On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
    
    > On Monday 17 December 2001 12:24 pm, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
    > > (FWIW, we had a few tcl/tk in Red Hat Linux a couple of years
    > > ago. All the ones we made are gone, and the ones in most apps as well)
    > 
    > The tcl/tk configuration apps.... Ugh.
    > 
    > Well, in any case, there is a problem with the pl/tcl build.  The 
    > /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh on RH 7.2 defines:
    > # Base command to use for combining object files into a shared library:
    > TCL_SHLIB_LD='gcc -pipe -shared -Wl,-soname,libtcl.so.0'
    
    That's for building libtcl. Not for building other libraries - they should 
    obviously have a different soname.
    
    -- 
    Trond Eivind Glomsrød
    Red Hat, Inc.
    
    
    
  7. Re: Pl/Tcl problem

    Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> — 2001-12-22T02:15:58Z

    On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
    
    > On Monday 17 December 2001 12:24 pm, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
    > > (FWIW, we had a few tcl/tk in Red Hat Linux a couple of years
    > > ago. All the ones we made are gone, and the ones in most apps as well)
    >
    > The tcl/tk configuration apps.... Ugh.
    >
    > Well, in any case, there is a problem with the pl/tcl build.  The
    > /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh on RH 7.2 defines:
    > # Base command to use for combining object files into a shared library:
    > TCL_SHLIB_LD='gcc -pipe -shared -Wl,-soname,libtcl.so.0'
    >
    > So this is where it comes from.  Now, why does it work with a non-RPM
    > installation?
    
    I compiled it on a non-RedHat installation and then copied the file.
    There was too much trouble involved in compiling directly in the RH
    server, so I used my own workstation instead. I don't know if it works
    compiling on RedHat.
    
    
    -- 
    Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]atentus.com>)
    "God is real, unless declared as int"