Re: pgindent run?
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T15:37:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >> Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes: > > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these > > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job > > of obfuscating the code changes. > >> > >> I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an > >> incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least > >> lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle. > > > What about having it happen on every CVS commit? > > Try that and you'll get all-out war. It's tough enough keeping in sync > with the repository already. Oh, well. I tried. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026