Re: pgindent run?

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T15:37:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:
> > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these
> > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job
> > of obfuscating the code changes.
> >> 
> >> I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an
> >> incremental basis, but only once per release cycle.  That at least
> >> lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle.
> 
> > What about having it happen on every CVS commit? 
> 
> Try that and you'll get all-out war.  It's tough enough keeping in sync
> with the repository already.

Oh, well.  I tried.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026