Re: pgindent run?

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > and most times, those have to be merged into the source tree due to
> > extensive changes anyway ... maybe we should just get rid of the use of
> > pgindent altogether?
> 
> I think pgindent is a good thing; the style of different parts of the
> code would vary too much without it.  I'm only unhappy about the risk
> issues of running it at this late stage of the release cycle.

This is the usualdiscussion.  Some like it, some don't like the risk,
some don't like the timing.  I don't think we ever came up with a better
time than before RC, though I think we could do it a little earlier in
beta if people were not holding patches during that period.  It is the
beta patching folks that we have the most control over.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026