Re: Performance monitor signal handler

> > I think Tom has previously stated that there are technical reasons not to
> > do IO in signal handlers, and I have philosophical problems with
> > performance monitors that ask 50 backends to do file IO. I really do think
> > shared memory is TWTG.
> 
> I wasn't really suggesting any of those courses of action, all I
> suggested was using rename(2) to give a seperate appilcation a
> consistant snapshot of the stats.
> 
> Actually, what makes the most sense (although it may be a performance
> killer) is to have the backends update a system table that the external
> app can query.

Yes, it seems storing info in shared memory and having a system table to
access it is the way to go.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026