Re: Performance monitor signal handler
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-13T14:54:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> At 13:34 12/03/01 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >Is it possible > >to have a spinlock over it so that an external utility can take a snapshot > >of it with the spinlock held? > > I'd suggest that locking the stats area might be a bad idea; there is only > one writer for each backend-specific chunk, and it won't matter a hell of a > lot if a reader gets inconsistent views (since I assume they will be > re-reading every second or so). All the stats area should contain would be > a bunch of counters with timestamps, I think, and the cost up writing to it > should be kept to an absolute minimum. > > > > > >just some ideas.. > > > > Unfortunatley, based on prior discussions, Bruce seems quite opposed to a > shared memory solution. No, I like the shared memory idea. Such an idea will have to wait for 7.2, and second, there are limits to how much shared memory I can use. Eventually, I think shared memory will be the way to go. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026