Re: Performance monitor

> At 18:05 7/03/01 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> All in all, I do not see this as an easy task that you can whip out and
> >> then release as a 7.1 patch without extensive testing.  And given that,
> >> I'd rather see it done with what I consider the right long-term approach,
> >> rather than a dead-end hack.  I think doing it in a signal handler is
> >> ultimately going to be a dead-end hack.
> >
> >Well, the signal stuff will get me going at least.
> 
> Didn't someone say this can't be done safely - or am I missing something?

OK, I will write just the all-process display part, that doesn't need
any per-backend info because it gets it all from 'ps'.  Then maybe
someone will come up with a nifty idea, or I will play with my local
copy to see how it can be done.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026