Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ]
Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
From: Patrick Welche <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-01-26T15:29:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 10:13:29PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de> writes: > > I just did that and ran make check 4 times. 3 times went completely > > smoothly, once I had random fail. This is the same behaviour that I saw > > when running make installcheck (76 successful most of the time, > > sometimes you get 75 out of 76 with random being the one that fails). > > Er, you do realize that the random test is *supposed* to fail every so > often? (Else it'd not be random...) See the pages on interpreting > regression test results in the admin guide. > > What troubles me is the nonrepeatable failures you saw on other tests. > As Peter says, if "make installcheck" (serial tests) is perfectly solid > and "make check" (parallel tests) is not, that suggests some kind of > interprocess locking problem. But we haven't heard about any such issue > on Solaris. Or simply running out of processes - check maxproc? (Deleted beginning of this thread, so may have missed something) Cheers, Patrick