Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-01-24T14:44:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Did we decide against LAZY?  Seems we have a number of people concerned
about vacuum downtime, and I can see this as a win for them.  If they
don't specify LAZY, the code is not run.

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > should be easily testable though, no?
> 
> What makes you think that?  
> 
> > worst case, we pull it out afterwards ...
> 
> No, worst case is that we release a seriously broken 7.1, and don't
> find out till afterwards.
> 
> There are plenty of new features on my to-do list, if beta no longer
> means anything...
> 
> 			regards, tom lane
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026