Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-01-24T14:44:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Did we decide against LAZY? Seems we have a number of people concerned about vacuum downtime, and I can see this as a win for them. If they don't specify LAZY, the code is not run. > The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > should be easily testable though, no? > > What makes you think that? > > > worst case, we pull it out afterwards ... > > No, worst case is that we release a seriously broken 7.1, and don't > find out till afterwards. > > There are plenty of new features on my to-do list, if beta no longer > means anything... > > regards, tom lane > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026