Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Christof Petig <christof.petig@wtal.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-01-19T17:25:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Seems we decided against this. Sorry. > Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > I can't decide if this is of general use. My inclination is that > > > someone in a transaction sitting a prompt should still show as idle. > > > > The idea seemed good to me, although I didn't look at the code to see > > if the implementation was any good ;-). I know we've frequently had > > questions on the lists where it was interesting to know if any > > transactions were being held open --- and right now there's no easy > > way to tell. > > > > regards, tom lane > > I would even propose 'idle (transaction open)' if you agree. (Seemed too > long for me) > The patch is _trivial_ a string changed to a condifional operator and two > strings (two times). A two liner. > > Christof > > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026