Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transaction is still open

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Christof Petig <christof.petig@wtal.de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-01-19T17:25:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Seems we decided against this.  Sorry.

> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > I can't decide if this is of general use.  My inclination is that
> > > someone in a transaction sitting a prompt should still show as idle.
> >
> > The idea seemed good to me, although I didn't look at the code to see
> > if the implementation was any good ;-).  I know we've frequently had
> > questions on the lists where it was interesting to know if any
> > transactions were being held open --- and right now there's no easy
> > way to tell.
> >
> >                         regards, tom lane
> 
> I would even propose 'idle (transaction open)' if you agree. (Seemed too
> long for me)
> The patch is _trivial_ a string changed to a condifional operator and two
> strings (two times). A two liner.
> 
>    Christof
> 
> 
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026