Re: User locks code
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM>, Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-08-24T00:31:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I definitely agree with Vadim here: it's fairly silly that the > contrib userlock code is GPL'd, when it consists only of a few dozen > lines of wrapper for the real functionality that's in the main backend. > The only thing this licensing setup can accomplish is to discourage > people from using the userlock code; what's the value of that? > > Besides, anyone who actually wanted to use the userlock code would need > only to write their own wrapper functions to get around the GPL license. Hey, I agree with Vadim too. The GPL license is just a roadblock, but I can't tell Massimo what to do with his code if it is not in the backend proper. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026