Re: Dollar in identifiers

> > >     In order to lower porting issues, I think it'd be nice to add
> > >     that  to  PostgreSQL  as  well.  It's  two more characters in
> > >     scan.l and doesn't break the regression test.
> > >
> > >     Objections?
> >
> > Yes.  We would move from standard C identifiers to $ identifiers.  We
> > have had zero requests for this so I see no need to add it.
> 
>     Standard  C?  I  was  talking  about  *allowing*  the  dollar
>     character in table-, column-, function-names!
> 
>     And not all requests show up directly on  the  mailing  lists
>     any  more.   We'll  see  those  (compatibility) requeses from
>     Toronto as well pretty soon I guess.
> 
>     The  thing  is  that  the  dollar  isn't  mentioned  in   the
>     definition  of  the  <SQL terminal character> (chapter 5.1 of
>     SQL3) at all. But all DB vendors seem to treat it at least as
>     <SQL language identifier part>.
> 
>     Could  you  live  with it when we don't allow a name to start
>     with a dollar, but allow the dollar inside or at the  end  of
>     the name?

We do currently use $1 for params, so allowing dollar in the middle
seems better.  However, I need to see multiple people who need it before
I would say OK.  If we go adding things because _one_ person wants it,
we will end up with a mess.  Someone is working on an
Oracle-compatibility parser.  It would be OK in there.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026