Re: Re: OpenOffice compile

Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>

From: Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org>
To: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com>
Cc: Craig Orsinger <orsingerc@epg.lewis.army_mil.invalid>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-05-28T16:12:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:08:06AM -0400, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> > 	IMHO, basing an open project on 7.6M lines of code that can only 
> > compiled on four or five different architectures
> 
> That many? OpenOffice hardly compiles anywhere, and it needs an
> _exact_ version of the compiler as it tries to do it's own exception
> handling. Very strange.

i beleive that Mozilla suffered from a similar fate when released by
Netscape.

while i don't know alot of people using Mozilla directly, i am aware of a
number of offshoot applications that are using the base source code.

i would agree that source-suites with 10 million lines of code are rather
un-wieldy.

however, i fully support the efforts of any group that tries to make it
a more sane thing.

OpenOffice/StarOffice/whatever would be a wonderful boon to the OSS movement.

it would be nice if the database engine behind it was a full fledge SQL
system like postgres.

-- 
[ Jim Mercer        jim@reptiles.org         +1 416 410-5633 ]
[ Now with more and longer words for your reading enjoyment. ]