Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-12-30T01:09:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> [001229 17:06] wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes: > > > My understanding (from the recent discussion) is that Postgresql > > > has certain dependancies on libreadline and won't compile/work > > > without it, > > > > Then you're working from a misconception. > > I think the misconception that he might be working on here is the point > someone brought up that when configure runs, it is adding -lreadline to > the backend compile, even though that I don't think there is any reason > for doing such? I thought psql required libreadline, I'm not sure who said it. If nothing requires it then there's not much point in moving to libedit from a devel cost/benifit analysis. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."