Re: GNU readline and BSD license

Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-12-30T01:09:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> [001229 17:06] wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:
> > > My understanding (from the recent discussion) is that Postgresql
> > > has certain dependancies on libreadline and won't compile/work
> > > without it,
> >
> > Then you're working from a misconception.
> 
> I think the misconception that he might be working on here is the point
> someone brought up that when configure runs, it is adding -lreadline to
> the backend compile, even though that I don't think there is any reason
> for doing such?

I thought psql required libreadline, I'm not sure who said it.

If nothing requires it then there's not much point in moving to
libedit from a devel cost/benifit analysis.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."