Re: beta testing version
Ross Reedstrom <reedstrm@rice.edu>
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
To: Adam Haberlach <adam@newsnipple.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2000-12-02T22:43:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 03:47:19PM -0800, Adam Haberlach wrote: > > > > Where's the damn core code? I've seen a number of examples already of > > people asking about remote access/replication function, with an eye > > toward implementing it, and being told "PostgreSQL, Inc. is working > > on that". It's almost Microsoftesque: preannounce future functionality > > suppressing the competition. Well, I'll admit that this was getting a little over the top, especially quoted out of context. ;-) > > For What It's Worth: In the three years (has it really been that long?) > that I've been off and on Postgres mailing lists, I've probably seen at > least 100 requests for replication, with about 40 of them mentioning > implementing it themself. > > I'm pretty sure that being told "PostgreSQL Inc. is working on that" is > not the only thing stopping it from happening. Most people just aren't up > to making it happen. Indeed. And it's only been less than a year that that response has been given. However, it is only in that same timespan that the functionality and performance of the core server gotten to the point were replication/remote access is one of immediately fruitful itches to scratch. We'll see what happens in the future. Ross