Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)

Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>

From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-11-16T20:12:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> [001116 12:09] wrote:
> * Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> [001116 14:02]:
> > > > This sounds like an interesting approach, yes.
> > > Question: Is sleep(0) guaranteed to at least give up control? 
> > > 
> > > The way I read my UnixWare 7's man page, it might not, since alarm(0)
> > > just cancels the alarm...
> > 
> > Well, it certainly is a kernel call, and most OS's re-evaluate on kernel
> > call return.
> BUT, do we know for sure that sleep(0) is not optimized in the library
> to just return? 

sleep(3) should conform to POSIX specification, if anyone has the
reference they can check it to see what the effect of sleep(0)
should be.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."