Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1

Mark Hollomon wrote:

> Correct. I don't know why anyone would want to change the definition of
> (say) int48eq, but if we are going to allow them to do so, we should be
> careful to allow them to backup and restore such a change.

Yes, and it is also important that if such weirdos exist, they are
allowed to backup this type of change separately from the databases.

--Gene