Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>, "'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'" <pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-29T05:59:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> >> This is really an unfortunate case where someone should have read the SQL
> >> standard before putting in a feature. The SQL keyword is TEMPORARY, and
> >> TEMP is really a popular name for a dummy table.
> 
> > So why not yank TEMP and require TEMPORARY?
> 
> Probably we ought to stop to ask why TEMP is in there to begin with;
> perhaps for compatibility with some other RDBMS?

It was me.  Informix uses it.

> 
> If not, I'd vote for pulling it out.  That's a heck of a poor word to
> reserve.

I am afraid of lots of user complaints, even if we had not already used
TEMP.


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026