Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] prob with aggregate and group by - returns multiplesh
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>, "'pgsql-sql@postgresql.org'" <pgsql-sql@postgreSQL.org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-29T05:59:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > >> This is really an unfortunate case where someone should have read the SQL > >> standard before putting in a feature. The SQL keyword is TEMPORARY, and > >> TEMP is really a popular name for a dummy table. > > > So why not yank TEMP and require TEMPORARY? > > Probably we ought to stop to ask why TEMP is in there to begin with; > perhaps for compatibility with some other RDBMS? It was me. Informix uses it. > > If not, I'd vote for pulling it out. That's a heck of a poor word to > reserve. I am afraid of lots of user complaints, even if we had not already used TEMP. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026