Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck@debis.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-02-28T08:28:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > > Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which > > > wouldn't have to skip over them. In outfuncs.c, we could either > > > have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or > > > make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label. > > > The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run. > > > > > > Comments? > > > > If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it. > > Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0. But we just required initdb for lztext. If we need another initdb later, maybe we should do it? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026