Re: [HACKERS] A further thought on rule string size

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck@debis.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-02-28T08:28:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > > Removing the labels would actually save code in readfuncs.c, which
> > > wouldn't have to skip over them.  In outfuncs.c, we could either
> > > have every node-writing subroutine know about two output modes, or
> > > make a post-pass that strips anything that looks like a field label.
> > > The latter would be less maintenance work in the long run.
> > >
> > > Comments?
> >
> > If you could keep the labels just for EXPLAIN, go for it.
> 
>     Not right now, put it onto TODO for after 7.0.

But we just required initdb for lztext.  If we need another initdb
later, maybe we should do it?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026