Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Now, how to convert these?  Not supplying the ops works fine, but
> > pg_dump supplies the ops.  Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops,
> > we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few
> > releases.  Comments?
> 
> Ugly, but probably the best stopgap for backwards compatibility ...
> at least I can't think of a better answer, since we have no way to
> change what 6.5 pg_dump will dump.
> 
> You're only going to suppress "network_ops" if it appears in the
> ops position of a CREATE INDEX, right?  Don't want to stop people
> from using the name for fields and so on.

No, just at that part in the grammar.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026