Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-02-08T00:05:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > Now, how to convert these?  Not supplying the ops works fine, but
> > pg_dump supplies the ops.  Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops,
> > we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few
> > releases.  Comments?
> 
> Actually, rather than hacking gram.y, it seems like it would be cleaner
> to put the kluge in whatever part of the parser looks up the ops name.
> 
> Of course a kluge is a kluge no matter what...

I like it in gram.y because it is more visible there and easier to
remove later.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026