Re: [HACKERS] network_ops in 7.0 and pg_dump question
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 2000-02-08T00:05:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Now, how to convert these? Not supplying the ops works fine, but > > pg_dump supplies the ops. Maybe in gram.y, if they supply network_ops, > > we should just remove that from being passed to the backend for a few > > releases. Comments? > > Actually, rather than hacking gram.y, it seems like it would be cleaner > to put the kluge in whatever part of the parser looks up the ops name. > > Of course a kluge is a kluge no matter what... I like it in gram.y because it is more visible there and easier to remove later. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026