Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Chris <chris@bitmead.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-02-03T13:26:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Let me add that to the TODO list.
> 
> Why not change that to a relnumindexes as well? Easier to maintain and
> more useful information.

Yes, we probably should do that, but I bet some interfaces us it. 
Comments?

Actually, looks like only pg_dump uses it, so maybe we would be OK.
Maybe 7.0 is a good time to fix this.

> 
> > > >Could you do that for relhassubclass?
> > >
> > > If we made it relnumsubclasses and incremented/decremented on
> > > CREATE/DROP, it seems easy in theory.
> > 
> > Yes, that would work.  Seems hasindex has problems.
> 
> ************
> 
> 


-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026