Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Chris <chris@bitmead.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-02-03T13:26:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > Let me add that to the TODO list. > > Why not change that to a relnumindexes as well? Easier to maintain and > more useful information. Yes, we probably should do that, but I bet some interfaces us it. Comments? Actually, looks like only pg_dump uses it, so maybe we would be OK. Maybe 7.0 is a good time to fix this. > > > > >Could you do that for relhassubclass? > > > > > > If we made it relnumsubclasses and incremented/decremented on > > > CREATE/DROP, it seems easy in theory. > > > > Yes, that would work. Seems hasindex has problems. > > ************ > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026