Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL

> Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> > Again, I think you've got the default backwards.  I remind you also
> > of something we've been beating on Peter about: psql is an application
> > scripting tool, so you don't get to redefine its behavior at whim,
> > anymore than you can change libpq's API at whim.
> 
> If this is the only objection, we could make the old behaviour available
> by a SET command, as well as a command-line switch, as well as a 
> ./configure option.
> 
> I hope we can get the best design here possible without over-emphasis
> on compatibility.

SET command is probably the best.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026