Re: Vacuum only with 20% old tuples
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Andrew McMillan <Andrew@catalyst.net.nz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-07-12T13:37:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> I can see some value in having a _configurable_ threshold %age of > deletes before vacuum kicked in and attempted to shrink table/index > on-disk file sizes. This would let the end-user decide, and 20% is > probably a reasonable default, but if it isn't then changing a default > is easier to do down the track. > > I can also see that it could be done with (perhaps) a modification to > VACUUM syntax, say: > VACUUM [VERBOSE] [SHRINK] ... > > And I believe that the whole thing will go better if ANALYZE is taken > _out_ of vacuum, as was discussed on this list a month or two ago. The analayze process no longer locks the table exclusively. It will be made a separate command in 7.1, though an ANALYZE option will still be avaiable in VACUUM. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026