Re: Big 7.1 open items

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Some unhappiness was raised about
> > depending on symlinks for this function, but I didn't hear one single
> > concrete reason not to do it, nor an alternative design. 
> 
> Are symlinks portable?

Sure, and if the system loading it can not create the required symlinks
because the directories don't exist, it can just skip the symlink step.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026