Thread

1. GRAM.Y help..............

   Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com> — 2000-06-06T12:54:09Z

   Can anyone help me remove the shift/reduce conflicts from the syntax? It
   works perfectly, but since you guys won't accept shift/reduce
   conflicts....
   
   -------- Original Message --------
   Subject: [HACKERS] gram.y help, ONLY syntax
   Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 14:13:00 +1000
   From: Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>
   To: Postgres Hackers List <hackers@postgreSQL.org>
   
   
   I've made changes to gram.y to reduce the conflicts down to a couple of
   harmless shift/reduce conflicts, but I don't seem to have the right
   black-magic incantations to remove these last ones. They seem to be
   related to ONLY syntax. Can anybody help?
   
   
   ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/gram.y.gz
   ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/y.output.gz
   ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/patch.only.gz
   
   

2. Re: GRAM.Y help..............

   Fredrik Estreen <estreen@algonet.se> — 2000-06-06T19:19:26Z

   Hi,
   
   does your patch still work if you make ONLY a ColLabel and not a 
   TokenId, this would lead to ONLY not being a ColId and by that 
   removing all unresolvable conflicts in the grammar? This patch 
   against your gram.y does this. I have tested it with bison 1.27,
   and verified that the conflicts are gone, but I have not tested 
   it for correct behavior in postgres. I did not have the time to 
   understand the whole grammar so I might have missed something 
   obvious.
   
   Regards,
   Fredrik Estreen
   
   Chris Bitmead wrote:
   > 
   > Can anyone help me remove the shift/reduce conflicts from the syntax? It
   > works perfectly, but since you guys won't accept shift/reduce
   > conflicts....
   > 
   > -------- Original Message --------
   > Subject: [HACKERS] gram.y help, ONLY syntax
   > Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 14:13:00 +1000
   > From: Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>
   > To: Postgres Hackers List <hackers@postgreSQL.org>
   > 
   > I've made changes to gram.y to reduce the conflicts down to a couple of
   > harmless shift/reduce conflicts, but I don't seem to have the right
   > black-magic incantations to remove these last ones. They seem to be
   > related to ONLY syntax. Can anybody help?
   > 
   > ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/gram.y.gz
   > ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/y.output.gz
   > ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/patch.only.gz

3. Re: [HACKERS] GRAM.Y help..............

   Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com> — 2000-06-07T11:36:17Z

   Fredrik Estreen wrote:
   
   > does your patch still work if you make ONLY a ColLabel and not a
   > TokenId, 
   
   You're a genius!
   
   I'm re-submitting this OO patch... Did the 7.1 tree start yet?
   
   ftp://ftp.tech.com.au/pub/patch.only.gz
   
   -- 
   Chris Bitmead
   mailto:chris@bitmead.com
   
   

4. Re: Re: [HACKERS] GRAM.Y help..............

   Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> — 2000-06-07T19:49:52Z

   > Fredrik Estreen wrote:
   > 
   > > does your patch still work if you make ONLY a ColLabel and not a
   > > TokenId, 
   > 
   > You're a genius!
   > 
   > I'm re-submitting this OO patch... Did the 7.1 tree start yet?
   
   Yes.
   
   -- 
     Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
     pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
     +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
     +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026