Thread
-
Re: Just checking on a few bugs...
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> — 2000-05-23T00:09:19Z
I never saw them. Strange. > I've sent two bugs to this list in the past few days from > one of my other accounts, and just got around to signing up for > the list myself--I wanted to see if they actually got here and > were addressed. > > The first involved SELECT/IN returning rows with empty fields > in ODBC > > The second involved pg_dump crashing while trying to dump the > indices of databases with indexed oid fields. > > Anyone see those two come by? The mailing list archive seems > to be missing a few days in there. > > -- > Adam Haberlach |"You have to understand that the > adam@newsnipple.com | entire 'Net is based on people with > http://www.newsnipple.com/ | too much free time on their hands." > -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
-
Just checking on a few bugs...
Adam Haberlach <adam@newsnipple.com> — 2000-05-23T00:20:15Z
I've sent two bugs to this list in the past few days from one of my other accounts, and just got around to signing up for the list myself--I wanted to see if they actually got here and were addressed. The first involved SELECT/IN returning rows with empty fields in ODBC The second involved pg_dump crashing while trying to dump the indices of databases with indexed oid fields. Anyone see those two come by? The mailing list archive seems to be missing a few days in there. -- Adam Haberlach |"You have to understand that the adam@newsnipple.com | entire 'Net is based on people with http://www.newsnipple.com/ | too much free time on their hands."
-
Re: Just checking on a few bugs...
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2000-05-23T01:32:32Z
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I never saw them. Strange. Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end... regards, tom lane
-
Re: Just checking on a few bugs...
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 2000-05-23T02:11:48Z
On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > I never saw them. Strange. > > Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping > traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that > were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come > through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end... Read Adam's original ... he subscribed to the lists *after* submitting the reports ... none of our lists will allow postings from non-subscribers, as has been configured for *ages* now ... Ed Loehr(sp?) just reported a similar problem with pgsql-general, and from everything I can tell from looking at the pre-Majordomo2 lists, he was never subscribed there or now ... this time, its not Majordomo2's fault ... Adam, did you get any message back, though, on those patches? It *should* send you something back to say it wasn't posted ... if not, then that would be Majordomo2 not doing it ...
-
Re: Just checking on a few bugs...
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> — 2000-05-23T02:19:13Z
> On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > I never saw them. Strange. > > > > Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping > > traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that > > were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come > > through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end... > > Read Adam's original ... he subscribed to the lists *after* submitting the > reports ... none of our lists will allow postings from non-subscribers, as > has been configured for *ages* now ... > > Ed Loehr(sp?) just reported a similar problem with pgsql-general, and from > everything I can tell from looking at the pre-Majordomo2 lists, he was > never subscribed there or now ... this time, its not Majordomo2's fault > ... When unsubscribers send an e-mail, don't they get some reply telling them they have to subscribe? -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
-
Re: Just checking on a few bugs...
Adam Haberlach <adam@newsnipple.com> — 2000-05-23T02:42:41Z
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 11:11:48PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > I never saw them. Strange. > > > > Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping > > traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that > > were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come > > through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end... > > Read Adam's original ... he subscribed to the lists *after* submitting the > reports ... none of our lists will allow postings from non-subscribers, as > has been configured for *ages* now ... Perhaps you should either have a bounce message or modify the bug submission form to mention this. > Adam, did you get any message back, though, on those patches? It *should* > send you something back to say it wasn't posted ... if not, then that > would be Majordomo2 not doing it ... They weren't patches, and no, I didn't get anything back. I assumed that anyone can submit a but. -- Adam Haberlach |"You have to understand that the adam@newsnipple.com | entire 'Net is based on people with http://www.newsnipple.com/ | too much free time on their hands."
-
Re: Just checking on a few bugs...
Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 2000-05-24T19:07:04Z
nope ... with this last rash of problems, I'm sitting and reading th rough each and every admin message and sending a message out to the user letting them know ... the concept appears to be that the last thing you want to do is let a spammer know that his message didn't go through .. :( On Mon, 22 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Mon, 22 May 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > I never saw them. Strange. > > > > > > Ditto. I'm beginning to wonder if the mailing lists are dropping > > > traffic now and then --- this morning I received several messages that > > > were cc'd to pghackers, but I haven't seen the pghackers copies come > > > through yet... OTOH the flakiness could be at this end... > > > > Read Adam's original ... he subscribed to the lists *after* submitting the > > reports ... none of our lists will allow postings from non-subscribers, as > > has been configured for *ages* now ... > > > > Ed Loehr(sp?) just reported a similar problem with pgsql-general, and from > > everything I can tell from looking at the pre-Majordomo2 lists, he was > > never subscribed there or now ... this time, its not Majordomo2's fault > > ... > > When unsubscribers send an e-mail, don't they get some reply telling > them they have to subscribe? > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org