Re: Need some help: attlen is pg_attributes gives a negative value.. .

> Roland Roberts <roberts@panix.com> writes:
> >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> Must have been quite a few versions back; attlen has been -1
> Tom> for variable-length datatypes for as long as I've been paying
> Tom> attention. (Of course char(n) isn't *really* variable length,
> Tom> but it's treated that way so that the representation is the
> Tom> same as for varchar(n) and text.)
> 
> > When did this change?  I haven't looked 6.5, but I thought 6.3 still
> > has bpchar as fixed length and char(n) was blank padded whereas
> > varchar was not.
> 
> char(n) was and is blank-padded, varchar(n) was and is not.  Sorry
> if I was imprecise enough to convey a different impression.
> 
> I'm fairly sure that attlen had its present semantics in 6.4.  6.3
> was before my time; any old-timers care to comment?

Since day 1, they were that way.  atttypmod was added in 6.3.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026