Re: 7.1 items
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: theo@flame.co.za
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-04-06T16:00:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > >>>> WAL/write ahead log > > >>>> TOAST/long tuples > > >>>> outer joins > > >>>> query tree redesign > > >>>> function manager redesign > > >>>> > > >>>> What year to we want to release 7.1? :-) > > > > > If all will right (and major developers will agree) I plan PREPARE/EXECUTE > > > commands and changes in SPI background for plan saving (query cache). > > > > Given that there is going to be a querytree redesign for 7.1, I'd > > suggest holding off on prepared plans until 7.2. Otherwise it's > > going to be a mess. > > Any chance for dirty read? Waiting for transaction end on inserts with > duplicates on unique keys in transactions can be a lot of fun. But we have committed read with no block. Why would you want dirty read. Chapter 10 of my book is about transactions and locking. Of course, I may be missing something here. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026