Re: git: uh-oh

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> It appears that the git conversion of the CVS repository is seriously
> screwed up.  For example, if you look at this:

Um ... Magnus has not given any report that he's finished running
the conversion.  What exactly are you looking at?

> It's too bad that nobody noticed this sooner, but I'm glad I noticed
> today rather than tomorrow.

We're not going to start using the git repository until everyone is
satisfied it's OK, both as to current contents and history.

			regards, tom lane