Horton

Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-12-09T03:45:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> To be clear about which version we're talking about:  
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20091130123456.4A03.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp 
> is the candidate for commit that includes the cleanup you've already done.

I suppose this is subject to the same auto_explain problem already
noticed for JSON, but I would suggest that we commit this first and
then fix both together, rather than create merge issues.

			regards, tom lane