Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>, "'Boszormenyi Zoltan'" <zb@cybertec.at>, "'Robert Haas'" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-01-24T17:30:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > Backend A: does SET PERSISTENT foobar =..; > Backend B: does SET PERSISTENT foobar =..; > Now B overwrites the config change A has made as they are all stored in > the same file. Say what? I thought the plan was one setting per file, so that we don't get involved in having to parse-and-edit the file contents. What was all that argument about a new directory, if we're only using one file? If we are using just one file, then I agree a lock would be needed to synchronize updates. But that seems to add a lot of complication elsewhere. regards, tom lane