Horton

Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, Mathijs Brands <mathijs@ilse.nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL-ports <pgsql-ports@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL-Admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-29T00:14:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:
> If it for pgmonitor then you guys ought to just mark it broken on
> these platforms, the non-"ps based" solution could have been
> implemented with all the time wasted trying to get the "ps based"
> hack working. :(

My thoughts exactly ;-) ... I'm willing to give advice about this,
but not to do any legwork myself.

PS status display does have some utility with or without pgmonitor,
but not enough to do a lot of work for.

			regards, tom lane