Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Mark Woodward <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-05-18T20:36:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Mark Woodward wrote:
>> Again, there is so much code for MySQL, a MySQL emulation layer, MEL for
>> short, could allow plug and play compatibility for open source, and closed
>> source, applications that otherwise would force a PostgreSQL user to hold
>> his or her nose and use MySQL.
>> 
> If we had infinite resources this might make sense. We don't, so it 
> doesn't. There is a real cost to producing a compatibility layer, and 
> the cost will be those spiffy new features.

The real problem is that there's a whole lot of stuff, such as mysql's
weak error checking, that I don't think a "compatibility layer" could
sanely provide.

			regards, tom lane