Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Mark Woodward <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>, "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>, John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-05-18T20:36:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Mark Woodward wrote: >> Again, there is so much code for MySQL, a MySQL emulation layer, MEL for >> short, could allow plug and play compatibility for open source, and closed >> source, applications that otherwise would force a PostgreSQL user to hold >> his or her nose and use MySQL. >> > If we had infinite resources this might make sense. We don't, so it > doesn't. There is a real cost to producing a compatibility layer, and > the cost will be those spiffy new features. The real problem is that there's a whole lot of stuff, such as mysql's weak error checking, that I don't think a "compatibility layer" could sanely provide. regards, tom lane