Re: beta6 pg_restore core dumps
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>, Martin Renters <martin@datafax.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-03-18T01:57:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au> writes: > At 12:31 17/03/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> This would be a lot simpler and cleaner if _PrintData() simply didn't >> append a zero byte to the buffer contents. Philip, is it actually >> necessary for it to do that? > Strictly, I think the answer is that it is not necessary. The output of the > uncompress may be a string, which could be passed to one of the str* > functions by a downstream call. AFAICT, this is not the case, and the code > should work without it, but it's probably safer in the long run to leave it > there. Considering that the data we are working with is binary, and may contain nulls, any code that insisted on null-termination would probably be ipso facto broken. regards, tom lane