Re: placeholder syntax

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@wiw.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-06-21T14:32:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@wiw.org> writes:
> Should Postgres accept ? as a placeholder?

We think it's an operator character:

regression=# select 1 ? 4;
ERROR:  operator does not exist: integer ? integer

I count eighteen standard operators that would be broken if we changed
'?' to mean a parameter.

I am also pretty unclear on why '?' is a good notation for parameters,
seeing that it is very hard for either the user or the machine to tell
which is which when there are multiple parameters.

In short, I think this notation sucks and I don't want to emulate it.

We do have the :foo notation in ecpg, which may be your closest parallel
for handling Oracle-workalike code anyway.

			regards, tom lane