Re: placeholder syntax
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@wiw.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2004-06-21T14:32:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@wiw.org> writes: > Should Postgres accept ? as a placeholder? We think it's an operator character: regression=# select 1 ? 4; ERROR: operator does not exist: integer ? integer I count eighteen standard operators that would be broken if we changed '?' to mean a parameter. I am also pretty unclear on why '?' is a good notation for parameters, seeing that it is very hard for either the user or the machine to tell which is which when there are multiple parameters. In short, I think this notation sucks and I don't want to emulate it. We do have the :foo notation in ecpg, which may be your closest parallel for handling Oracle-workalike code anyway. regards, tom lane