Re: Documentation clarification request: pg_dumpall and Large Objects

On Sun, 2026-03-29 at 13:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> > Commit 763aaa06f0 has changed the situation: with the addition of other formats
> > than the plain format, it no longer makes sense to say that pg_dumpall
> > is not useful for backup.  Still, we should clarify what is *not* included.
> 
> > The attached patch does that and in passing improves the readability.
> 
> Pushed with trivial grammatical adjustments.  I also failed to resist
> the temptation to improve the newly-added text nearby.

Thank you,
Laurenz Albe