Horton

Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect

Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-02T04:41:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2018/05/02 13:38, Amit Langote wrote:
> --- a/contrib/amcheck/expected/check_btree.out
> +++ b/contrib/amcheck/expected/check_btree.out
> 
> +-- verify partitioned tables are rejected (error)
> +SELECT bt_index_check('bttest_partitioned');
> +ERROR:  "bttest_partitioned" is not an index
> 
> Perhaps, I'm just repeating what's already been said, but I think it might
> be better to have the word "partitioned" in the message.
> 
> ERROR: "bttest_partitioned" is partitioned index
> 
> ..which Robert seems to think might not be too bad.
> 
> That will need adding some code to these modules like we did in
> c08d82f38ebf763 [1].

Sorry, it appears that our mail system added "[SPAM]" to the subject-line
for one reason or another, which I forgot to manually remove when editing
the email.

- Amit

Commits

  1. pgstatindex, pageinspect: handle partitioned indexes

  2. Add relkind 'I' to catalog.sgml's list relkinds