Re: Deadlock between concurrent index builds on different tables
Martin Marques <martin.marques@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Martin Marques <martin.marques@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com>, Jeremy Finzel <finzelj@gmail.com>
Cc: Postgres General <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-12-23T11:22:33Z
Lists: pgsql-general
El 23/12/17 a las 08:08, Alban Hertroys escribió: > >> On 22 Dec 2017, at 22:53, Jeremy Finzel <finzelj@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 2017-12-22 15:48:07.669 CST,"CREATE INDEX",2017-12-22 15:48:02 CST,8/32,0,ERROR,40P01,"deadlock detected","Process 4470 waits for ShareLock on virtual transaction 4/262; blocked by process 4466. >> Process 4466 waits for ShareLock on virtual transaction 8/32; blocked by process 4470. >> Process 4470: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY index_foo_on_created_at ON foo USING btree (created_at); >> Process 4466: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY index_bar_on_id ON bar USING btree (id);","See server log for query details.",,,,"CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY index_foo_on_created_at ON foo USING btree (created_at);",,,"" > > If I read these logs correctly, you are creating the exact same index on foo (created_at) in both processes, which is just what you were trying to prevent doing. They are two distinct indexes. One on foo(create_at) and the other on bar(id) -- Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
Commits
-
Fix deadlock hazard in CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY
- fb7b43903e91 9.6.7 landed
- 82f1c3b7d1e0 9.5.11 landed
- 6d2a9ae0ed17 10.2 landed
- 54eff5311d7c 11.0 landed
- 47a3a1317873 9.4.16 landed