Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Performance down with JDBC 42

Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>

From: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas@a-kretschmer.de>
To: pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2023-11-05T16:52:13Z
Lists: pgsql-performance

Am 05.11.23 um 17:20 schrieb Abraham, Danny:
> Thanks Laurenz,
>
> Traced two huge plans. They differ.
> The fast one does use Materialize and Memoize  (the psql).
> Is there something in JDBC 42 that blocks these algoruthms?

*maybe* the driver changed some settings. You can check it with

select name, setting from pg_settings where name ~ 'enable';

using the JDBC-connection.


Regards, Andreas


>
> Thanks again
>
> Danny
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
> Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2023 11:07 PM
> To: Abraham, Danny <danny_abraham@bmc.com>; psql-performance <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Performance down with JDBC 42
>
> On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 19:08 +0000, Abraham, Danny wrote:
>> Asking for help with a JDBC related issue.
>> Environment: Linux 7.9 PG 14.9 , very busy PG Server.
>>
>> A big query - 3 unions and about 10 joins runs :
>> - 70ms on psql , DBeaver with JDBC 42  and  in our Server using old
>> JDBC 9.2
>> - 2500 ms in our Server using new JDBC 42 driver. ( and  this is
>> running many times)
>>
>> Question: Is there a structured way to identify optimization setup ( Planner Method s ) changes?
>> Are there any known changes specific to JDBC 42.
> What I would do is enable auto_explain and look at the execution plan when the statement is run by the JDBC driver.  Then you can compare the execution plans and spot the difference.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe

-- 
Andreas Kretschmer - currently still (garden leave)
Technical Account Manager (TAM)
www.enterprisedb.com