Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences, take 2
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2023-07-14T14:31:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Migrate logical slots to the new node during an upgrade.
- 29d0a77fa660 17.0 cited
-
Make test_decoding ddl.out shorter
- d6677b93c79b 17.0 landed
- c5c5832600e9 14.9 landed
- b1dc946eee3d 16.0 landed
- 3bb8b9342f8a 15.4 landed
-
Fix snapshot handling in logicalmsg_decode
- 949ac32e1267 15.3 landed
- 8b9cbd42b61f 14.8 landed
- 4df581fa0f4b 13.11 landed
- 497f863f0598 12.15 landed
- 8de91ebf2ac1 11.20 landed
- 7fe1aa991b62 16.0 landed
-
doc: Adjust a few more references to "postmaster"
- 17e72ec45d31 16.0 cited
-
Revert "Logical decoding of sequences"
- 2c7ea57e56ca 15.0 cited
On 7/14/23 16:02, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > ... >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hmmmm, that might work. I feel a bit uneasy about having to keep all >>>> relfilenodes, not just sequences ... >>> >>> From relfilenode it should be easy to get to rel and then see if it's >>> a sequence. Only add relfilenodes for the sequence. >>> >> >> Will try. >> > > Actually, adding all relfilenodes to hash may not be that bad. There > shouldn't be many of those. So the extra step to lookup reltype may > not be necessary. What's your reason for uneasiness? But yeah, there's > a way to avoid that as well. > > Should I wait for this before the second round of review? > I don't think you have to wait - just ignore the part that changes the WAL record, which is a pretty tiny bit of the patch. regards -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company