Re: Prepared transaction releasing locks before deregistering its GID

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> 
> Attached is an updated patch.  Thanks for the feedback. 

@@ -1755,7 +1755,7 @@ void
 multixact_twophase_recover(TransactionId xid, uint16 info,
                           void *recdata, uint32 len)
 {
-   BackendId   dummyBackendId = TwoPhaseGetDummyBackendId(xid);
+   BackendId   dummyBackendId = TwoPhaseGetDummyBackendId(xid, true);
    MultiXactId oldestMember;
 
RecoverPreparedTransactions calls ProcessRecords with
twophase_recover_callbacks right after releasing the TwoPhaseStateLock, so I
think lock_held should be false here (matching the similar call of
TwoPhaseGetDummyProc at lock_twophase_recover).

Since the patch touches TwoPhaseGetDummyBackendId, let’s fix the comment
header to mention it instead of TwoPhaseGetDummyProc

> Now, it seems
> to me that the potential ABI breakage argument (which can be solved by
> introducing an extra routine, which means more conflicts to handle
> when back-patching 2PC stuff), and the time it took to find the issue
> are pointing out that we should patch only HEAD.

Sounds reasonable.

Regards,
Oleksii Kliukin