Re: Fix typo 586/686 in atomics/arch-x86.h

> On 19 Dec 2025, at 08:23, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 4:00 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 28 Nov 2025, at 09:44, Jakub Wartak <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> That's a typo in src/include/port/atomics/arch-x86.h, isn't it ?:
>>>  if defined(__i568__) || defined(__i668__) || /* gcc i586+ */
>>> If yes, then a patch is attached. Not that it harms something or
>>> somebody has such old hardware, but I've just spotted it while looking
>>> for something else.
>> 
>> That indeed looks like a clear typo, but if noone has complained since 2017
>> then maybe removing the checks is the right course of action?
> 
> I believe CI tests with -m32, so as long as we do that we should
> probably make that work the way we think it does.

It does, but will this affect that?  Does gcc change the CPU arch to 32bit era
hardware when using -m32?  I was under the impression that it built code that
can run in 32-bit mode on the underlying hardware unless a specific target arch
was defined - but this is outside my wheelhouse so I might well be uninformed.

Regardless, applying this shouldn't affect anything unless compiling on Pentium
Pro or pre-MMX Pentium instruction sets, so it seems quite harmless and as the
intention was to support it the best course of action is probably to just apply
this.

--
Daniel Gustafsson