Horton

Re: Why we need to check for local buffers in BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty?

Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath.reddy@zohocorp.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath.reddy@zohocorp.com>
To: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-12-09T05:09:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
---- On Sun, 08 Dec 2024 18:23:21 +0530 Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote ---



Hi Srinath, 
 
On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 at 11:17, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla 
<mailto:srinath.reddy@zohocorp.com> wrote: 
> > ---- On Fri, 06 Dec 2024 16:40:51 +0530 Nazir Bilal Yavuz <mailto:byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote --- 
> > LGTM. 
> 
> sorry i didn't get,what you meant to say is the assert failure which i said is correct and does my patch to this looks good?🤔 
 
Sorry if I was not clear. Yes, I wanted to say what you said is 
correct and the patch looks good to me. 
 
-- 
Regards, 
Nazir Bilal Yavuz 
Microsoft

Commits

  1. Make BufferIsExclusiveLocked and BufferIsDirty work for local buffers.